I personally do not agree with the common perception of the term transvestism because it insinuates a profane and cynical signification...
Femdom and transvestism they can generate an interesting symbiosis because they are complementary :
The Femdom aspires to dominance on man, and the submerged cult of the male transvestism tries to satisfy his dichotomy, his latent femininity and his intimate desire of aesthetic freedom that the society denies to the man from birth with manly sophisms...
consequently, the transvestism could conjugate its goals with those of Femdom, in a couple relationship in which the woman satiates his thirst of supremacy by offering to the man a subordinate role, in which he will go at gratify his impassioned transgression jointly to the promise of venerate his Mistress, who with shrewdness will go to instill in her submissive man a constant feeling of culpability connected to the pagan rite of transvestism...
In this hypothetical scenery
the woman exercises its power especially sublimating the social aspects related to psychology, eroticism and expert mixtures of elitist female fetishes that fatally arouse the reverent admiration of his particular man, which under the aegis of his Mistress will go to experimentig a promising matriarchal coexistence in which will evolve the transvestism...
In the above mentioned relationship the man will be pressed by turbulent instances of transvestism, but he will have to follow the directives of his Mistress that conveniently and gradually will go to lead the male patner also in the brilliant world of the sissy maid and its declensions...
Now the undisputed hegemony of the Woman is complete, and she will be able to extend its influential power in the thousands of variables Femdom in symbiosis with his devoted and peculiar partner...
My definition of male transvestism :
the submerged phenomenon of the male transvestism is not a pathology, nor mannerism, fetishism or gender dysphoria, not even paraphilia, psychic dissonance or whatever mysterious ... it is rather a natural and liberating externalization that the ecumenical society stigmatizes and condemns with commendable alacrity...